To illustrate the difference between pricing in Training-Online.eu and other platforms, here is an example of cost calculation.
Beside this illustration there is the FREE enrollment plan in Training-Online.eu and the system may be run at zero cost.
Therefore your cost may be easily calculated and forecasted!
Let's consider that you have 100 users and want to perform training each two months, which means 6 times a year.
| |
1 course enrollment | 1,3 USD |
100 users (1,3 * 100) | 130 USD |
6 times a year (130 * 6) | 780 USD |
YEARLY COST = | 780 USD |
This is a more traditional pricing model, whenyou usually pay once a month for a package based on a number of users, teachers or courses in your system. In practice, this means you really have to keep an eye on those key numbers and make sure that your platform contains only up to date entries that will ensure you a proper price band, as you don't want to pay more for an inactive content. For 100 users, the monthly cost would be around 300 USD.
| |
1 month | 300 USD |
12 month (300 * 12) | 3600 USD |
YEARLY COST = | 3600 USD |
In contrast to the first mentioned method, you still have to pay the monthly fee even if there is no activity in some of the months.
This means in practice that if you are using this pricing model, you cannotconsider interruptingyour electronic education for some time. In case you stop paying for any reason, you lose the access and all your users'study performance data as this kind of systems simply doesn't allow the interruption of payment. Knowing this, you basically have no other choice than just continuing to pay. You are trapped!
Compare the cost on 6 courses for yourself, Training-Online.eu is 79 % cheaper!
6 courses a year are not enough, you think? Try assigning 12 courses a year, in which case the user would have to perform 1 training a month.Even with such a demanding training,Training Online is still 50 % cheaper than the traditionally priced systems.
Don't forget, you may still use the FREE plan and your running cost may be zero!
And which system provides better flexibility in costs?